One of the most controversial decisions in Daredevil’s history — and often derided as one of the worst — was to change Daredevil’s costume in Dardevil #321, the third issue of the ambitious “Fall From Grace”. Abandoning the now-classic red costume he had worn since Daredevil #7, writer D.G. Chichester and penciler Scott McDaniel designed a new costume that provided armored protection against the heavier hitting bad guys with whom Matt was contending. The result can speak for itself.
Plainly, Matt was getting serious. Then and now, I unapologetically love this costume. I recognize it has flaws, some silly 90s affectations that perhaps haven’t aged well, but, there is a lot to enjoy here.
Color Scheme/Design: First off, the new color scheme is infinitely more interesting than either of Daredevil’s previous two costumes. A costume composed entirely of one color is about as boring as it gets. Even characters who are entirely red like Mephisto, Surtur, or Red Hulk actually have other colors in play at the same time. Traditionally, Daredevil is simply a red body stocking with a tiny blotch of pink at his lower face. By contrast, look at the way the red accents pop against the blue-gray background color on the new costume! I think the designs on the arms are beautiful and intimidating for reasons I can’t explain at all. Even the white/light gray shoulders and wrists add to the overall interesting color dynamic. And menacing red eyes are always a win.
Armor Shape: Second, the rather subtle manner in which Daredevil’s shape is changed makes him a much more physically imposing figure. His chest and shoulders bulge powerfully. I’m not sure if having his billy club on his forearm is more or less convenient than having it on his leg, but I think it’s a better look from a purely aesthetic standpoint. While slightly bulkier, Daredevil’s lines are still lithe and graceful.
Practicality: Third, putting Daredevil in some real armor just makes so much damned sense. After getting his rear kicked a hundred times, you’d think Matt would have had this brainstorm considerably earlier. How many other non-super-powered heroes who routinely fight big bad guys don’t wear armor? Batman and Punisher aren’t that stupid. Admittedly, body armor can limit movement, possibly negating one of Daredevil’s greatest strengths. But, as evidenced by this costume, there is a happy compromise between armor and mobility. Additionally, thanks to the darker color scheme, this costume is considerably more useful in Daredevil’s typical night environment than his bright red one. (Even the disappointing Daredevil film saw the need to darken Matt’s costume to a deep red to make it work at all.)
Logo: Fourth, has Daredevil’s logo ever looked better? The design is basically the same as it has ever been, but now it pops off the costume. If one is going to have a logo, there seems no reason that it should be barely noticeable. This one certainly doesn’t suffer from that problem.
Overall: While very different from the original two costumes, I do not see this costume and wonder who it is: it is obviously still Daredevil. Whatever the essential nature of a Daredevil costume may be, I think the armored Daredevil preserved it. (I suspect this may be the point that I lose everyone on.)
Legs: I’ve got nothing here. I have no idea what’s going on with the spiky things on the outsides of his legs, nor the strange knee pads. This is the only part of the costume that makes me scratch my head a bit. There must be a better option, though I like the intent to break up Daredevil’s monochromatic color scheme.
Sadly, the armored Daredevil costume did not last terribly long (it was shown torn to shreds in Daredevil #345) and has never been seen again. Even Matt’s Shadowland-era costume, which drew comparisons, had little in common with this much busier outfit. Perhaps this costume was doomed by the fact that it simply didn’t seem to look nearly as good when anyone other than Scott McDaniel drew it. Others seem to agree with me on that point, as noted in this snippet from Kuljit Mithra’s truly excellent interview with Chichester, McDaniel, and inker Hector Collazo for the 15th anniversary of “Fall From Grace”.
Mithra: I’ve always felt that no one could really draw DD in his new costume better than Scott [McDaniel]. . . it just looked wrong when others drew it.
Chichester: That was the tragic flaw of the damn thing! Whether it was a nod to the silly biomimetic conceit, or just ’cause he designed it, Scott had the toughness of the thing flow out of the character. It always looked and felt very fluid and organic. Everyone else seemed to interpret it as “armor”, and never bothered to think it through one pencil line further. Then it was stiff and limiting, as if it was affixed outside the man. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone had actually gone and drawn rivets on the thing. . . .
McDaniel: Like Dan [Chichester], all I see now are the flaws in my work, so I think it’s overly generous to say I drew the suit better than anyone! But Dan articulated the idea well — the suit was to be a flexible part of the man, not a crusty add-on. As long as DD’s body line was made graceful, the suit worked. Supple, but tough as nails.
Considering how much Scott McDaniel’s style has changed over the last 17+ years, I don’t think even his return to Daredevil would save this costume from the dust bins of history. Alas, alas! There must be someone else out there who loves this thing as I do, right? Right?
7 comments
Eric says:
Dec 27, 2011
This is a fantastic piece! I happen to totally disagree with the author here (I’ve never been able to hurdle the knee pad/leg armor parts of this myself…and I never liked the rest of it!) Even though I disagree (I LOVE the red suit, it’s iconic!), this is a VERY well written discussion. Kudos!
Aaron K says:
Dec 27, 2011
Thanks for the kind words, Eric. Looking back at the costume change, I wonder if there were any possible alternatives that would have been acceptable to red-suit purists. As you say, it’s an iconic costume after all! Some people will probably just never be all that happy with anything else. Regardless, the XTREME 90s was probably not the best time to give it a try.
Robert says:
Dec 27, 2011
Like many things in 90s, this costume was a great idea that was taken several steps too far and the result was too drastic of a change. I too always loved this costume for the most part. Personally the problem with the costume, I think, are the silver parts which are what give it the “armor” look. Imagine that costume with the silver replaced with black and more of a traditional tights look. It would’ve played a lot better.
Uncanny says:
Dec 28, 2011
I also am not a fan of the costume, but I enjoyed the article nonetheless. For me, I could stand Matt wearing some light body armor…but only along the shins and forearms. Much more than that just seems too restrictive. All just my opinion, naturally.
Bee Clayton says:
Dec 30, 2011
I still like it, a better costume change than some I remember from around the same time. Love the staves attached to his forearms.
The only thing I disagree with concerning this design is how Matt manufactured it. Can’t remember it exactly, but something about composite materials or biometrics, lots of computer fashioning, quite a bit for a blind man to accomplish on his home computer.
R.M. Hendershot says:
Jan 3, 2012
I, too, always thought that costume looked bizarre when anybody but McDaniel drew it–and it especially made Matt look too bulky and unwieldy. And in most depictions, Matt’s already a big guy, thanks to his boxer father. One of the descriptions of his build that stuck with me (because I read it early on) was from Christopher Golden’s Daredevil novel, where he mentioned that Matt should really be too big for what he does. He’s at least six feet tall, maybe a little over, and while that doesn’t stand out in superhero-land, it makes him a giant by the standards of a lot of really good fast-moving martial artists. He’s fighting at a profound disadvantage because of the extra stress on his joints, etc., that comes of putting a six-foot body through moves designed for five-footers. (Maybe that’s why he fights so many opponents who are even bigger than he is?) Why weigh him down or bulk him out further?
That said, I agree that body armor makes sense. (But I’m amused by the people who want him to have armor only on his wrists and shins–what, not over his vital organs or the areas marksmen are trained to shoot for? Are we dressing him by the standards of female fantasy armor now?) And I agree that dark colors make more sense for him, unless you’re really desperate for jokes about a blind man’s fashion sense.
I think that’s probably why I’ve always preferred artists who draw Daredevil with a lot of black on his body and carefully chosen red highlights. His logo pops a lot more, but he himself doesn’t stick out as much in all his nighttime scenes.
Bill says:
Jan 3, 2012
I think it’s implied that Matt’s costume is more than just spandex in the modern age, even if it is visually the same. In Guardian Devil Smith said it was micromesh steel and designed by Reed Richards. In any case I have mixed feeling about the armor outfit. I was not a fan of the shoulder pads but I liked the relief of color (I think I said that right).
The costume came with a story I really enjoyed (and still do). And it also came with an odd art direction that took away the black lines and made things hard to see.